Lee Hong-ki defends Choi Min-hwan.

article: Lee Hong-ki, Choi Min-hwan sides… “If it turns out that you never provided sexual services, will you take responsibility?”

source: OSEN via Nate

[+172, -2] Please be quiet. What's going on? I thought you were smart, why do you interfere in a couple's affairs?

[+111, -1] Hongki, hold on to this… No matter how close you think you are to someone, you can't be close enough to know everything that happens between a couple. Take a cue and get your butt out.

[+98, -2] Okay, so what if he didn't solicit prostitution? Is it safe to say that the father of three children was there in the first place? Cosplaying as your beloved father on TV?

[+49, -1] Of all the times I have to defend someone, come on

[+43, -1] We all heard the recording, what does it say about Hongki… This is not your job to defend. There is no room for misunderstanding here. We all heard him asking if there were any women available. Wake up~~

[+4, -0] There seems to be something suspicious lurking in Lee Hongki as well.

[+3, -0] Are you still defending yourself even though you have a recorded request to get a motel room? Want to make sure there are extra toothbrushes in your room? Is it possible for women to request?? Are you deaf or something??? No matter how close you think you are to that person, stay quiet.

[+1, -0] Birds like feathers~~

[+1, -0] He's into prostitution, but it's still problematic that he was there, whether he asked for it or let you sleep with him for free. Especially as a husband and father…

[+1, -0] Hongki needs to know when to step away from the couple's affair. There is already recorded evidence, and the police have already started their investigation… I think 90% of it will go to trial.

[+1, -0] What is Hongki's play here? I already have a recording as evidence.

–